Author: Conlan Campbell

Examining student attitudes toward war a century ago

Founded in 1874, St. Olaf has its roots in American history. Student publications, such as the Manitou Messenger, begun in 1887, and the Viking Yearbook, started in 1904, offer a record of campus response to changing tides in U.S. history. This article will specifically track U.S. military actions, beginning around the turn of the 20th century and continuing to the First World War.

From April to August 1898, the United States backed Cuban insurgents in an uprising against their Spanish colonizers, a conflict called the Spanish-American war. After a joint U.S.-Cuban victory, Spain agreed to cede a number of colonies to the U.S., including the Philippines. A number of Messenger articles contended with the conflict, with the majority discussing its value for the country.

One article, released in April 1898, focused on the war as just and as a demonstration to the world of the United States’ role.

“Above all, the United States must stand for right; the president has shown to the world that we stand for right and justice in the impending conflict,” the article read.

Another article, released in May of that year, emphasized the war as an ideologically unifying force.

“The war will cost much in money and perhaps in blood, yet it will not be without good results even beyond the freeing of Cuba … it has demonstrated that the great rupture between the North and South is completely healed so that now the Gray as well as the Blue are ready to defend and, if necessary, die for ‘Old Glory;’ and finally it will … add fresh lustre to the name of our young republic, the champion of the oppressed, the destroyer of tyranny,” the article read.

Other articles focused on the impact the war had on American citizens.

“It was not a long war, nor was it a close struggle, but it gave birth to heroes, and opportunity for achievements to which Americans both now and in the future may point with pride and admiration,” read another article from October of that year.

Another controversial element of the war was the U.S. acquisition of colonies from Spain and whether those acquisitions were just. Few, if any, St. Olaf students were in vocal opposition, evidenced by an editorial by Lawrence Grimsrund in December of that year.

“America cannot consistently with her own interests let go the foothold she has secured in consequence of the late war,” Grimsrund wrote.

The general attitude of St. Olaf students appeared to favor this war as a reflection of American ideals and as a positive good for the country domestically and internationally.

Following the turn of the century, student discussion of war shifted to greater focus on the role of patriotism and the reasons for involving the nation in conflicts.

“In 1898 an army was marshaled, not to swell an eastern despot’s pride, not to devastate the country and make the sky glow with burning towns, nor to leave whole cities of dead; but to march to distant climes against oppression and tyranny, to give the privileges and liberties which they themselves enjoyed to a people driven forth to battle,” C.C.A. Johnson ’06 wrote in November 1905.

In the edition of the Viking Yearbook for the classes 1913, 1914 and 1915, a multiple page spread is dedicated to the celebration of St. Olaf alumnus Captain Alfred Bjornstad. He is described as “one of the many ex-students of St. Olaf who have ‘made good’” because of his military service in the Philippines. The dedication continues with a strong endorsement of Bjornstad’s ability.

“We are ardent believers in Carnegie’s peace movement, but if there is to be war we shall find Captain Bjornstad ever ready with his daring and skillful head to fight for the right,”  wrote C.A. Mellby.

In 1914, the First World War officially began. The conflict had little initial impact on the published works of St. Olaf, and very few considered the United States as having a role. The Viking Yearbook for the 1916, 1917 and 1918 classes did not make much mention of the war, save for a testimonial from Mabel Jacobs ’13, an alumni speaking about her experience as a student in Germany. Written in April 1915, the piece displays pro-German sentiment and downplays any impact of the war.

“The student in Germany this year does not need to become stagnant, nor a nervous wreck, if he has any strength of mind,” Jacobs said. “Brooding over the war, or trying to solve political problems much beyond his horizon is neither profitable, nor elevating, and altogether unnecessary so long as he has work, operas, concerts, and plays to keep him busy,” Although German sentiment is strongly opposed to the selling of arms and ammunition to the belligerents by the United States, still the Germans do not force us into defending her stand.”

However, some students on campus condemned the war, such as Herman Bakken ’15, in an article titled “the Economic Detriment of War.”

“The present day sees Europe as a vast amphitheater of waste and devastation. The combined pent-up militant energies of no less than eleven nations have been released to wage a war unparalleled in history,” Bakken wrote. “Thousands of cheerful and happy homes have been draped with sorrow and discontent where mothers and children are eking out a most miserable existence.”

Anti-war sentiments grew in 1916, when Joseph Lee ’16 wrote an article condemning nationalist patriotism as a force sustaining the war, singling out Germany.

“The evil of this autocratic power is well illustrated by the patriotic devotion to the German State,” Lee wrote. “Here we find a patriotism asserting itself in duplication of Napoleonic conquests; a patriotism enlivened and vitalized by a desire for national aggrandizement, both in terms of territory and industry.”

He also expressed hope at a close end to the conflict, emphasizing different nations plans.

“Evidences of a coming victory of peace is shown by the growing and effective sentiment that is being expressed in peace organizations thruout (sic) the world. England has organized a union of democratic control for the settlement of peace; Germany, a union to oppose land-grabbing; Switzerland is effectively modifying public opinion thru her International Peace Organ, and Norway is making valuable contribution to the cause of peace by her Nobel Foundation Fund.”

Despite hopes for a swift end to the conflict, the U.S. entered the war on April 6, 1917, marking a severe tonal shift in St. Olaf publications. Articles, such as “The College Student and the War,” published on April 10, 1917 were not given a named author and focused on individual duty to participate in the war effort.

“Our nation has reached a serious crisis. As college students we will be vitally affected by our country’s recent action in regard to entering the European conflict,” the article read. “The only test of whether patriotism is genuine or not is its willingness to make sacrifices … We believe that when the Nation needs them the college men of America will be ready to defend the Flag and the heritage of Democracy which it stands for.”

After over a year of U.S. involvement, the war ended on November 11, 1918. In commemoration, the Viking Yearbook for the classes of 1919, 1920 and 1921 focused greatly on the war. Uniquely titled “Victory Viking,” the yearbook incorporated an eagle symbol on the cover.

Among the first dedications is to alumnus and then-General Bjornstad and the “650 students and ex-students of St. Olaf who took part in the World War.” Bjornstad and the others were described as having “made good” through their participation in the war.

The book also includes a history of the class of 1921, written by “Chris” ’21 and “Maia” ’21, which describes the effect the war on those conscripted and those not.

“With the call to colors many of the boys of ‘21 were numbered in the ranks. Those who remained at school substituted military drill in their former recreation periods. But while our class thus decreased in numbers our loyalty and pride for country and class increased. We returned to our Sophomore year under new and strange conditions to which all readily adapted themselves,” they wrote. “After the armistice was signed, and the beginning of the year 1919, the entire college was put back upon a normal basis. Besides our class members in the S.A.T.C. many returned who had seen active service.”

The yearbook also included a dedication titled “Fighting for Old Glory,” which expressed the College’s support for those who fought.

“St. Olaf College will cherish always the deeds and sacrifices of the men who went out to fight for God and Country. It was our proud privilege to contribute over six hundred college men to the forces of the nation in the hour of her peril.” wrote A.O.L. ’20.

Another part of the yearbook focuses on the role of women during the war, documenting first aid classes and a checklist of activities women students could pledge themselves to. Elements of the pledge included volunteering for the Red Cross, “reducing lunches to an absolute minimum” and maintaining “the highest standards of womanhood, physical, intellectual, social and spiritual.”

Following the war, the yearbook suggests  classes and other scholastic activities were resumed as before. However. some questioned the lasting impression the war may have on people, including an article in the Messenger asking “Will the Lessons of War Be Made Permanent?” focusing on rationing.

“Will Americans return after the war to their pre-war extravagance? Or will they learn to abide by the lessons of war? Extravagance, not needed during the trying times of today, cannot be necessary during peace,” the article reads. “When normal times are again resumed by a democratic world, will it be too much to expect that banquets and receptions will retain the simplicity acquired during this war?”

× Featured

United States needs to stop antagonizing Russia

Webcams around campus are an invasion of privacy

On the St. Olaf campus, because of six publicly accessible live webcams, anyone may see students in their everyday lives. Walking through the Buntrock crossroads on the way to class, sitting in the Quad in the middle of the day and walking into their dorm at night, watched but unaware of the gaze.

St. Olaf is small and insular by design. The College’s architecture reinforces community with communal space. This idea isn’t controversial, and is widely marketed. The three dining options, most notably Stav Hall, are structured to prevent physical distance between students. Couched as being “intensely residential,” students are all but forced to live in dorms, where the furthest person either shares your room or is 20 feet away from you through a thin wall. Residential and academic lounges invite isolation only until another person comes by. Every moment is a performance, because there is no place where eyes may not be on you.

This social pressure and lack of privacy is troubling, but not unknown. Some see it as the price of the unique sense of community St. Olaf offers. The ability to always run into others is part of the College’s brand. However, this promise needs serious re-examination in light of its broadcast outside of the immediate physical space.

The panoptic system is one in which individuals are disciplined by being convinced they can always be seen, and regulated accordingly. This can lead them to regulate their own behavior. St. Olaf’s lack of architectural privacy privileges this kind of system, but the webcams amplify the problem and pose a true threat to privacy.

The webcams, plainly advertised on the St. Olaf website, include Alumni Hall West, facing towards Ytterboe and the wind turbine; Tomson East, including the wind chime memorial and much of the campus green; Tomson West, showing more of the campus green, Mellby Hall, and the Theater Building; Buntrock Plaza, showing the back entrance of the building and yet more of the campus green; the East Quad, showing Regents Hall of Natural Sciences, Holland Hall and Old Main and the “Hi, Mom!” camera, posted outside the Lion’s Pause in the Crossroads of Buntrock Commons.

The outdoor cameras offer a bird’s eye view of a large portion of campus, making their view inescapable for many students as they walk to and from their dorms and class. Individuals appear small, but are identifiable. If someone had the inclination, they could track these cameras and know exactly when another person is leaving or going to any building, making them an ideal tool for potential stalkers or others with malicious intent. Beyond that usage, they serve as a constant reminder that no behavior on the St. Olaf campus is truly private. Beyond the performance for other individuals within an actual physical space, these cameras offer a view to the world’s public.

Very few are actively aware of this level of exposure, as demonstrated by the aforementioned “Hi, Mom!” camera, situated at eye level and advertised as a way for family members to check in on students. When the school advertises the camera, it is suggested as a tool used consciously to directly acknowledge those watching. The suggested image is of a student looking into the camera and waving to their mother, watching on the other side. However, watching the webcam for only a few moments will demonstrate that very few who pass by know they are being watched.

Buntrock Commons’ Crossroads is aptly named. It is centrally located on campus, and a huge number of students pass through it every day. It is immediately outside the Pause and Viking Theater. It is directly underneath the Cage and Stav Hall. It is between many dorms and academic buildings. It is a very common location for political demonstration, including the night-long protest against racial discrimination and inequality that begun the Collective for Change on the Hill’s movement last year. Every time a student stands in this space or walks through it, their face and body are broadcasted live and very few acknowledge it physically when they do. 

The entrance to Viking Theater is in its view. A space where people may step out of a film to collect themselves. A space where people may share a private moment because it feels tucked away, unexposed. Lines to Pause events often stretch out the door, likely placing those waiting into the webcam’s view for some time. Exchanges thought to be confined to that space are projected outside its physical context. 

Physical context is the essential element lost when these webcams broadcast campus. The “Hi, Mom!” name underlies the justification for such a tool, and its ultimate failure. Those at St. Olaf are accustomed to being seen and it is an essential part of the collective understanding of “community” as it exists here. This camera is then constructed as proof of that community. “Mom” is a stand-in for whoever the investor may be: the person who likely, at least partially, subsidizes a student’s place here and likely played a role in choosing this school over others. If not, it is suggested the person on the other side has some level of investment in observing the school live, and taking in evidence the advertised “community” promise exists. St. Olaf College is a product, and these live webcams are a constant advertisement for it.

This is the fundamental difference between architecture that favors communal space and cameras that open that space up to anyone online who may observe it. Those in the space, even if coerced to be performative, are active participants. They are in it, and all others in it are conscious of their role. Those on the webcam can not be seen and they are not participants. They are voyeurs consuming a product: the ongoing moments of St. Olaf College commodified. And as long as students are within that camera, they are part of the product.

× Featured

United States needs to stop antagonizing Russia

Umbrella causes campus lockdown

Without advance explanation or warning, students were asked to leave Rolvaag Memorial Library and other campus buildings on the night of Monday, Sept. 18. The buildings were then locked down and searched by Public Safety while Northfield Police patrolled the campus. An email from Public Safety Director Fred Behr later in the night explained that the search was the result of a report from a student of a potentially armed, unidentified individual on campus.

The initial report was filed to Public Safety at 8:45 p.m. after a student saw a group of three white males walking between Mellby Hall and Larson Hall, one of whom was carrying a long, thin object the caller believed could be a firearm, but was later confirmed to be an umbrella.

Public Safety contacted Northfield Police about the situation, and met with a number of officers at 9:05 p.m. The police officers were briefed on the initial report before being deployed on foot and in vehicles. Additional Public Safety staff was also dispatched. After searching footage from campus cameras, Public Safety officers identified and interviewed another witness, who offered additional information.

According to Behr, Public Safety made the decision to close campus buildings for the sake of locking and checking them without students present.

At 10 p.m. an announcement over the intercom in Rolvaag instructed students to leave the building. Public Safety officers went through Buntrock clearing out students.

“The usual statements would be something like ‘A situation has developed that requires us to lock this building early. Please leave through the nearest exit,’” Behr wrote.

Many students were confused about the situation. According to Public Safety dispatcher Sarah Kalsow ’19, who went into the dispatch office around 10 p.m. after being asked to leave Skifter Hall, the night was very busy.

“We had a lot of people calling wanting clarification,” Kalsow said. “We could only tell them so much. Usually when events like this happen, we have a prepared statement that Marketing and Communications prepares for us that we are allowed to tell us, but we are not allowed to answer further questions.” 

At 11:02 p.m. a text message and email were sent out to students via the OleAlert system, a program designed to inform students about relevant emergencies on campus. As of 2015, all students are uploaded to the system by default. 

With the subject line “Current Campus Lockdown,” the email and text read “Buildings were closed early tonight. There is no credible threat at this time. Please check your e-mail for additional details.”

At 10:52 p.m., prior to the OleAlert message, an email from Behr established that the object previously believed to be a gun was an umbrella, asked any students with information regarding the situation to contact Public Safety and notified the campus that they did not determine a current risk.

Behr isolated sending an OleAlert earlier, streamlining the notification process and specifying that it was not a lockdown but that buildings were being locked as the source of issues that would be considered in future situations.

“An Ole Alert would be issued to the campus when we felt there was a ‘credible threat’ or ‘hazardous situation’ on campus or near campus, Behr wrote. “Due to the very vague and conflicting information we were working with initially, we elected to hold off on sending the message prematurely.”

× Featured

United States needs to stop antagonizing Russia

Title IX

On March 30, 2016, Madeline Wilson ’16 and the Gray Shirt team donned their “Ask how my college is protecting my rapist” T-shirts and sparked a campus-wide debate on how the College handles sexual assault cases. Since then, the College’s Title IX policy has experienced a massive overhaul. Now, national changes may impact St. Olaf’s policy.

On Sept. 22, the Office of Civil Rights (OCR) – the arm of the Department of Education that handles Title IX policy – sent out a letter rescinding Obama-era Title IX guidelines, including letters from 2011 and 2014. The now-retracted suggestions established standards that required schools to complete sexual misconduct investigations within 60 days and use a “preponderance of evidence” or “more likely than not” standard for rulings.

While some schools have resisted rolling back these guidelines, St. Olaf is already in compliance with the new standards.

“None of the new guidance or anything the OCR is pointing to is inconsistent with our current approach,” said Carl Lehmann ’91, Vice President and General Counsel for the College.

It’s true. In regards to the time limit, current St. Olaf policy states that the College strives to complete investigations within 60 days, but will extend that period if necessary. Violation of the former 60 day rule is one of the charges filed against the College in an ongoing investigation by the OCR.

“One of the allegations against the school is that we didn’t complete our investigation within 60 days. We took 72 days,” Lehmann said. “We never felt like that was something to be concerned about. We thought it was more important to get it right than to get it done within 60 days.”

Still, it is unlikely the school will change its policy of striving to complete investigations in under 60 days.

“At the moment we are anticipating we will keep our current policy,” Vice President for Mission and Title IX Coordinator Jo Beld said. “It has worked well for us. When you think about 60 days, it’s a half a semester, and that’s a very long time for students to be in that situation of being in an investigation.”

The rollbacks could also affect St. Olaf’s standard of evidence.

“Under the new guidance, schools can either adopt a preponderance of evidence or a clear and convincing evidence standard,” Lehmann said. “Right now we are in compliance with our preponderance of evidence standard.” 

The clear and convincing standard is not required by law and would require more evidence of guilt before making a final determination. Whether St. Olaf will keep its old standard or adopt a new one is not something that will be decided without student feedback.

“On Thursday, Oct. 19, during community time, we will have the beginning of that conversation with a general question and answer [session],” Beld said. “Go over what this guidance is, what we are going to do and then give people a chance to ask questions.”

While St. Olaf is in agreement with these guidelines, the College will always avoid conflicting with OCR guidance.

“We’re going to make sure we are in compliance, because being able to participate in federal financial programs is vital. If our students can’t participate in those programs, we’re out of business,” Lehmann said. 

Being found non-compliant with OCR standards triggers a sequence of events in which a school would be asked to change the policy. If an institution were to refuse to change its policies and ignore letters of Finding and Enforcement Action, then its students would be disqualified from federal aid programs. This includes grants, student work support, student loans and parent loans. At St. Olaf, these federal programs provide over $15.6 million.

Beld and Lehmann also clarified these recommendations are interim guidance and that they do not necessarily reflect a permanent policy change. 

“Since we don’t know what that final outcome is going to look like, we don’t think it will serve our community well if we make a change now, and then maybe the new final guidance will be different in some ways,” Beld said.

Instead of focusing on ongoing policy changes, the College looks to training and prevention as the next step. They have begun by expanding training for first-year students beyond the previous online training.

“This year in particular we’ve been investing a lot of time and energy thinking about prevention and education, and we’ve got now a subcommittee of the Title IX team that includes people who are not on the Title IX team to wrap our heads around a coherent and systematic approach that is infused throughout the student experience,” Beld said.

These changes are in part informed by the Title IX Advisory Group, formed as a response to the Title IX Working Group. It consists of representatives from Student Government Association, the Sexual Assault Resource Network (SARN), Gay, Lesbian or Whatever (GLOW), the Student Life Committee, a college pastor, the Wellness Center director and a senior female administrator from athletics. Every year this group takes in feedback from the student body and offers recommendations. Following the massive overhaul in the summer of 2016, this summer’s changes were less substantive.

“It was more adjusting organization, making sure that, wherever possible, we were using plain language and not legal jargon, making sure that we eliminated any gender bias – we wanted to use gender neutral language,” Beld said.

Still, the College believes that students feel more comfortable using the school as a resource in situations of sexual assault than they had before, as evidenced by this year’s record of reports.

“They show increase in reports of sexual misconduct, which I would take as a good sign, because I don’t think that means there’s been an increase in the number of incidents on campus, I think there has been an increase in people on campus who feel comfortable reporting it to us,” Lehmann said.

An upcoming HEDS survey will explore student perception of how the College deals with sexual assault. This report will be released soon with feedback from the college.

“The main takeaway is that St. Olaf looks like the other institutions,” Beld said.

Correction: A previous version of this article mischaracterized the process by which the federal government could remove funding for not adhering to Title IX guidelines. It has been updated to reflect the complexity of the process.

× Featured

United States needs to stop antagonizing Russia

St. Olaf Considering Changes to Mental Health Services

Cost cutting efforts have been a priority for St. Olaf this year. One possibility for saving college money is to outsource Boe House Counseling Center, the college’s primary mental health service, to a third-party organization.

Students fear that Boe House could be closed entirely, but Kari VanDerVeen, Associate Director of Marketing and Communications for Media Relations, said there is no threat to Boe House.

“Boe House is not going to be shut down,” VanDerVeen wrote, specifying that for the time being Boe House’s operations will not change. “Students can and should continue to access services at Boe House as they usually do.”

However, the College is considering other options for on-campus mental health services.

“Allina Health is in talks with St. Olaf about some kinds of collaboration, but discussions are very preliminary and there are no details we can share at this time,” Spokesperson for Allina Health Timothy Burke wrote.

While a future partnership with Allina is possible, the College has not received enough details to determine what the new arrangement could look like.

“We have not had any proposals from any providers, so we don’t know what that health care might look like or whether it would be good for the College,” VanDerVeen wrote. At press time, the College is expected to receieve a proposal from Allina within two weeks.

Regardless, a number of students feel they may be left out of the decision altogether.

“My worry was that if we waited two weeks to see what the proposal was and then fight it and say that ‘no, this is not what students want,’ then by then it is going to be too late,” Greater Than Campaign Chair Sarah Freyermuth ’19 said. Greater Than is a student organization that advocates for mental health and connects students with mental health services on campus.

Although the details are unknown, out-sourcing services could change the future operations of Boe House.

“One of our biggest concerns is that it would be insurance-based,” Greater Than Campaign Community Director Julie Johnson ’19 said. Johnson elaborated that for students without comprehensive insurance, it could become more difficult for them to access services. A record of treatment would also be reflected in shared family insurance, creating a barrier for students who wish to keep their treatment private.

“You can see Boe House right now without your family knowing about it, which is crucial for a lot of people,” Johnson said. “College is one of the most volatile, difficult parts of your life, in which you probably need mental health care more than after.”

If the college were to outsource mental health services to an outside organization that required insurance, it could also mean students would have a copay for services.

“In order for your mental health services to be billable to insurance, you need to have a diagnosis. Right now people can go to Boe House and see them for anything,” Freyermuth said.

There is precedent for outsourcing college services, according to VanDerVeen, who cited the partnership with Bon Appetit for catering and dining services and the partnership with Northfield Hospital and Clinics for Student Health Services.

“It always makes sense to ask whether the things that need to get done at the college should be done by the college or by another entity that has expertise in that area,” VanDerVeen wrote. She is hopeful a deal could improve Boe House.

“There may be an opportunity here to provide better services than we do now for the same, or lower, cost,” VanDerVeen wrote. “If we were to get a compelling proposal, we would certainly want to share it with the users of our health services for comment.”

However, Greater Than advocates expressed doubt.

“This might not be a bad thing if they can handle everything that we are asking, but it’s scary because there is a huge chance that they can’t,” Johnson said.

Moving forward, Greater Than hopes that students will be involved in the decision.

“Maybe nothing will happen, but maybe Boe House will be completely changed, and the thrust of the problem is that students won’t really have a say in what happens,” Freyermuth said. 

× Featured

United States needs to stop antagonizing Russia